This aspect is important because it enables an exchange of views and ideas, but not in the form of a comment but in a more organized manner, that of the journal article. The negative aspect about the collaboration with the Journal is the fact that there is no actual online version of the Journal, an element which limits drastically its accessibility. The communication of the ideas available is essential for the author who can benefit from critics as well as favorable reviews. However, the fact that there is no possibility on this site for people and visitors to comment on the articles sent by the collaborators is a negative aspect especially if taken into consideration that commenting and advising is indeed a good resource of the site.

Finally, another aspect cannot be perceived positive or negative, but rather one worth mentioning...

From one point-of-view, this focus is benefic because it allows a certain sense of transparency in the leadership and it is a good democratic exercise. At the same time though, this wide focus appears to be as long as an actual article, without providing actual useful information. The fact that the members of the organization are not presented but rather given an email address makes the endeavor of pacing them on the Internet an even more futile affair.
In any situation, with few adjustments, the site of the NOHS represents a useful guide for those wanting to have a glimpse on the activity of the organization.

National Organization of Human Services website. 23 may 2008. http://www.nationalhumanservices.org/?q=board-of-directors.